Apple confirms it tried to make Apple Look ahead to Android for 3 years — firm reveals plans in response to DOJ lawsuit

[ad_1]

On March 22, 2024, the DOJ slammed a lawsuit on Apple’s desk, claiming that the agency is proscribing competitors with a monopoly that doesn’t let different corporations have a chunk of its very tasty pie. One of many components introduced ahead by the DOJ to display Apple’s restriction of competitors is the Apple Watch, which the Division claims forces customers to stay with iPhone.

In response to the DOJ assertions, Apple informed 9to5Mac that it took three years to contemplate permitting the Apple Watch to work with Android, solely to overlook the concept due to “technical limitations.” 

Apple Watch almost labored with Android

The DOJ lawsuit claims that, “Apple makes use of smartwatches, a expensive accent, to stop iPhone prospects from selecting different telephones. Having copied the concept of a smartwatch from third-party builders, Apple now prevents these builders from innovating and limits the Apple Watch to the iPhone to stop a unfavorable “impression to iPhone gross sales.”

Later it states that “Apple’s smartwatch—Apple Watch—is simply appropriate with the iPhone.” It continues, “So, if Apple can steer a consumer in the direction of shopping for an Apple Watch, it turns into extra expensive for that consumer to buy a special sort of smartphone as a result of doing so requires the consumer to desert their expensive Apple Watch and buy a brand new, Android-compatible smartwatch.”

The DOJ reckons that Apple Watch customers are locked to the iPhone, making them both purchase one other of the most effective iPhones when theirs dies in order that they’ll maintain utilizing their Apple Watch. That, or they must spend all their cash to interchange the Apple Watch with an Android smartwatch in order that they’ll purchase a brand new Android cellphone.

This landmark authorized battle is the subsequent in an extended line of litigation that Apple has needed to endure, from the Epic Video games case, to the EU’s USB-C and Lightning case and its Digital Markets Act. This one, nonetheless, may drag out even longer — the DOJ will not be recognized for doing issues by halves, or all that rapidly.

Extra from iMore

[ad_2]

Supply hyperlink

AI Picture Technology Meets Digital Costume Up

‘3 Physique Drawback’: How the ebook and the Netflix present differ