the ten analysis papers that coverage paperwork cite most

[ad_1]

G7 leaders gather for a photo at the Itsukushima Shrine during the G7 Summit in Hiroshima, Japan in 2023

Policymakers usually work behind closed doorways — however the paperwork they produce supply clues concerning the analysis that influences them.Credit score: Stefan Rousseau/Getty

When David Autor co-wrote a paper on how computerization impacts job ability calls for greater than 20 years in the past, a journal took 18 months to think about it — solely to reject it after evaluate. He went on to submit it to The Quarterly Journal of Economics, which finally revealed the work1 in November 2003.

Autor’s paper is now the third most cited in coverage paperwork worldwide, in response to an evaluation of information supplied completely to Nature. It has accrued round 1,100 citations in coverage paperwork, present figures from the London-based agency Overton (see ‘Essentially the most-cited papers in coverage’), which maintains a database of greater than 12 million coverage paperwork, think-tank papers, white papers and pointers.

“I believed it was destined to be fairly an obscure paper,” recollects Autor, a public-policy scholar and economist on the Massachusetts Institute of Know-how in Cambridge. “I’m excited that lots of people are citing it.”

The highest ten most cited papers in coverage paperwork are dominated by economics analysis. When economics research are excluded, a 1997 Nature paper2 about Earth’s ecosystem providers and pure capital is second on the checklist, with greater than 900 coverage citations. The paper has additionally garnered greater than 32,000 references from different research, in response to Google Scholar. Different extremely cited non-economics research embrace works on planetary boundaries, sustainable meals and the way forward for employment (see ‘Most-cited papers — excluding economics analysis’).

These lists present perception into the sorts of analysis that politicians take note of, however coverage citations don’t essentially indicate affect or affect, and Overton’s database has a bias in the direction of paperwork revealed in English.

Interdisciplinary affect

Overton normally prices a licence charge to entry its quotation information. However final 12 months, the agency labored with the London-based writer Sage to launch a free web-based software that permits any researcher to learn the way many occasions coverage paperwork have cited their papers or point out their names. Overton and Sage stated they created the software, referred to as Sage Coverage Profiles, to assist researchers to show the affect or affect their work may be having on coverage. This may be helpful for researchers throughout promotion or tenure interviews and in grant purposes.

Autor thinks his examine stands out as a result of his paper was completely different from what different economists had been writing on the time. It instructed that ‘middle-skill’ work, sometimes performed in places of work or factories by individuals who haven’t attended college, was going to be largely automated, leaving staff with both extremely expert jobs or handbook work. “It has stood the take a look at of time,” he says, “and it received individuals to give attention to what I feel is the precise downside.” That subject is simply as related at the moment, Autor says, particularly with the rise of synthetic intelligence.

Walter Willett, an epidemiologist and meals scientist on the Harvard T.H. Chan Faculty of Public Well being in Boston, Massachusetts, thinks that interdisciplinary groups are most definitely to achieve loads of coverage citations. He co-authored a paper on the checklist of most cited non-economics research: a 2019 work3 that was a part of a Lancet fee to analyze methods to feed the worldwide inhabitants a wholesome and environmentally sustainable weight loss program by 2050 and has accrued greater than 600 coverage citations.

“I feel it had an affect as a result of it was clearly a multidisciplinary effort,” says Willett. The work was co-authored by 37 scientists from 17 international locations. The staff included researchers from disciplines together with meals science, well being metrics, local weather change, ecology and evolution and bioethics. “None of us may have performed this on our personal. It actually did require working with individuals exterior our fields.”

Sverker Sörlin, an environmental historian on the KTH Royal Institute of Know-how in Stockholm, agrees that papers with a various set of authors usually appeal to extra coverage citations. “It’s the mixed impact that’s usually the important thing to getting extra affect,” he says.

Sörlin co-authored two papers within the checklist of high ten non-economics papers. A kind of is a 2015 Science paper4 on planetary boundaries — an idea defining the environmental limits through which humanity can develop and thrive — which has attracted greater than 750 coverage citations. Sörlin thinks one purpose it has been standard is that it’s a sequel to a 2009 Nature paper5 he co-authored on the identical subject, which has been cited by coverage paperwork 575 occasions.

Though coverage citations don’t essentially indicate affect, Willett has seen proof that his paper is prompting adjustments in coverage. He factors to Denmark for instance, noting that the nation is reformatting its dietary pointers in keeping with the examine’s suggestions. “I actually can’t say that this doc is the one factor that’s altering their pointers,” he says. However “this gave it the assist and credibility that allowed them to go ahead”.

Broad brush

Peter Gluckman, who was the chief science adviser to the prime minister of New Zealand between 2009 and 2018, will not be stunned by the lists. He expects policymakers to discuss with broad-brush papers moderately than these reporting on incremental advances in a subject.

Gluckman, a paediatrician and biomedical scientist on the College of Auckland in New Zealand, notes that it’s essential to think about the context through which papers are being cited, as a result of research reporting controversial findings typically appeal to many citations. He additionally warns that the checklist might be not complete: many coverage papers will not be simply accessible to instruments corresponding to Overton, which makes use of textual content mining to compile information, and so is not going to be included within the database.

“The factor that worries me most is the age of the papers which might be concerned,” Gluckman says. “Does that inform us one thing about simply the best way the evaluation is finished or that comparatively few papers get closely utilized in policymaking?”

Gluckman says it’s unusual that some latest work on local weather change, meals safety, social cohesion and related areas hasn’t made it to the non-economics checklist. “Perhaps it’s simply because they’re not being referred to,” he says, or maybe that work is cited, in flip, within the broad-scope papers which might be most closely referenced in coverage paperwork.

As for Sage Coverage Profiles, Gluckman says it’s at all times helpful to get an thought of which research are attracting consideration from policymakers, however he notes that research usually take years to affect coverage. “But the typical educational is making an attempt to make a declare right here and now that their present work is having an affect,” he provides. “So there’s a disconnect there.”

Willett thinks coverage citations are most likely extra essential than scholarly citations in different papers. “Ultimately, we don’t need this to only sit on an instructional shelf.”

[ad_2]

Supply hyperlink

maxon launches drive techniques portfolio designed for robotics

Greatest VPN Offers: Nab a VPN Subscription for as Low as $2 Per Month